G & A
G
ravett and Associates
Maximizing People Assets

 
 

 

Home
About Us
Announcements
Articles
Book a Speaker
Calendar
Clients
Code of Ethics
Consulting
Dr. Gravett's Book
Ethics Manual
Links
Testimonials
Training
Refer This Site
Feedback
Contact Us
 

 
 
   
ARTICLE

Close this window

07-11

It’s Show Time:  The Emotionally Intelligent Trainer in Action

Linda Gravett, Ph.D., SPHR and Sheri Caldwell, Ph.D., SPHR

 

 

You’ve been through an exhaustive needs assessment process.  You’ve thoughtfully designed a seminar in line with specific objectives.  Now, it’s “show time,” the make-or-break component of the training process.  At this juncture, your emotional intelligence level is critical because of its correlation to success. 

 

In the event you’re not certain what “Emotional Intelligence” is, EI encompasses:

¨       One’s ability to understand one’s emotions

¨       One’s ability to recognize, analyze, and understand others’ emotions

¨       One’s ability to appropriately respond to a situation given the environment and the situation

In this article, we’ll address how an emotionally intelligent trainer ensures a successful training event, starting with establishing a positive environment for learning and moving on to specific behaviors that will enhance the experience for participants and the trainer. 

 

Establishing a Positive Environment for Learning

 

Not only does an emotionally intelligent trainer design a positive training environment, he or she is in tune with workshop participants during the course of training and can adapt from moment to moment to ensure that there’s an energy flow throughout the event.  In this section, we’ll share some techniques from our research for our upcoming book, The Emotionally Intelligent Trainer, that successful trainers use to maximize learning and behavior change.

 

Emotionally intelligent trainers ask a lot of questions during the training event that are designed to heighten participants’ awareness of key points and critical lessons.  Questions we like include:

¨       What did you just learn about yourself?

¨       How can you use this information tomorrow?

¨       What do you think about this approach?

¨       How can you adapt this technique to your work?

¨       How would you explain this concept to a coworker?

In addition to asking a lot of questions, effective trainers listen to the responses and tailor their training style to meet participants’ needs.  In a recent time management training session, I (Linda) asked, “How can you use this activity log to plan your week in the future?”  One person said, “My experience with activity logs hasn’t been very good.  I don’t know if I want to try these again.”  I needed to ask some more questions before moving on!  I inquired about the reasons why the tool didn’t work for her previously.  She – and others – were able to articulate experiences with poorly executed activity logs.  Now we were getting somewhere.  This discussion provided me with an opportunity to share concrete ways to avoid the pitfalls that the participants detailed.

 

Emotionally intelligent trainers become students of body language.  We’ve found that body language communicates what people are truly feeling, more so than words.  For instance, have you heard trainers ask, “Are there any questions?” or “Does anyone want me to review this segment again?”  and then barely glance around the room to determine whether anyone is  confused or frustrated?  The emotionally intelligent trainer instead asks, “What questions do you have?”  This shows the participants that questions are expected and that it is okay to actually ask.

 

Just as you need to read and interpret students’ body language, you’ll want to be aware of the messages your own body language is sending.  I (Linda) distinctly remember the first graduate-level class I taught several years ago.  I was nervous about leaving out essential points in the lecture portion of my classes.  I had extensive notes, and I placed them on a small table beside me so that I could refer to them often.  I was tethered to those notes.  My eye contact was good; I invited class participation; but I confined my movement during class to a two-foot radius of the table.  I was very surprised to read this comment (often) in the student evaluations at the end of the quarter:  “Linda is not approachable.  She doesn’t walk around and talk with us during class.”  That was not the message I intended to send!  Now when I teach, I walk around freely, notes in hand for easy reference.  It works for Oprah Winfrey, why not for me?!

 

Emotionally intelligent trainers acknowledge that workshop participants have expertise and experience.  Yes, the trainer has (or should have) a high level of subject matter expertise.  In our research, we found that workshop participants weren’t especially enthralled with trainers that had knowledge of the topic but didn’t invite participant discussion and interaction.  People want to share their own experiences and suggestions.  To be successful as a trainer, it’s necessary to foster a give-and-take dialogue within the classroom (without letting one or two participants dominate).  Here’s an example provided by one of our surveyed trainers:

 

            “I was facilitating an in-house workshop on the business case

            for diversity initiatives.  I noticed that a guy in the back kept

            making comments to people at his table.  The entire class

            became distracted.  So I broke the class into breakout groups

            to discuss some real-world scenarios.  I asked ‘the talker’ to be

            the reporter for his group.  That quieted him down for the rest of

            the morning…at least from the sidebars.”

 

An emotionally intelligent trainer shows respect for participants’ feelings.  Especially in a technical training session, participants may feel insecure about their ability to learn new skills.  The trainer who fosters an environment in which all questions are valid and can be repeated more than once will be valued and appreciated.  We know of a computer software trainer who walked into the training session for the first of several classes wearing a giant fake thumb on his left hand.  His opening line, as he held up his hand, was “This is probably how most of you feel right now…and that’s normal!”  Everyone laughed, and tension was eased tremendously.  If a workshop participant is feeling anxious, frustrated, or unmoved by an explanation, that feeling should be acknowledged and not discounted.  Then, the trainer can move forward to address the person’s unease, starting with a question such as, “What would help you feel more comfortable about this tool/technique/approach?”

 

Once a positive workshop environment is established, the emotionally intelligent trainer takes additional steps to sustain an environment conducive to learning.

 

Balancing Listening with Telling

 

Think about someone you know who you believe to be an excellent listener.  What exactly do they do (or not do) that leads you to characterize this person as a good listener?  Perhaps some of the descriptors you identified are similar to ours:

¨       Maintains eye contact

¨       Asks questions

¨       Doesn’t interrupt when you answer questions

¨       Doesn’t judge or appear shocked by what you’re sharing

¨       Paraphrases to ensure understanding

An emotionally intelligent trainer exhibits these skills during training sessions, and the result is that participants want to share their ideas, make suggestions, and ask questions.  This in turn promotes an energizing and productive training environment.

 

On the flip side, consider how you would respond in this situation…..

 

            Mary tuned out two hours ago, but unfortunately the training

            is scheduled for three more hours.  Three…more…long hours

            with Joe, the trainer.  Joe has been expounding on his sales

            exploits without pausing for breath since early morning.  At first,

            his stories were interesting.  But no one can get a word in

            to make a point or ask a question.  Yes, he’s an experienced

            sales professional…but Mary wants to learn from others in

            the workshop.  If Joe would just shut up for a minute…

 

Learning for adults must be interactive and experiential.  Students won’t experience anything except drowsiness if trainers aren’t astute enough to balance “telling” and “listening.

 

Encouraging Interaction

 

If you’re a trainer, you’ve probably experienced a group that was introverted and (seemingly) unresponsive to your attempts at promoting a two-way dialogue.  We’ll share some approaches from successful trainers that will jump-start your sessions when this happens.

 

Our first message is for you extroverts out there….you know who you are!  The message is this:  a moment of complete silence is OK.  Ask a thought-provoking question.  Pause.  Let people know they can have time to think.  Not to worry – someone will respond.  We don’t recommend, however, that you goad participants into responding with comments like, “Come on…somebody knows this,” or “Don’t you guys talk?!”

 

Consider asking two or three people in advance to be prepared to share their perspective on some of the discussion questions you plan to use.  Even introverts will be talkative during class when they’ve had some time to process their thoughts and ideas.  For that matter, why not share your workbook in advance for people to review?  If there are articles or books you intend to use as a reference, provide an advance reading list.

 

Sometimes individuals are not as comfortable discussing questions or concerns in front of the entire group as they are in small breakouts.  The emotionally intelligent trainer for in-house training will do some homework to discover which participants work effectively together.  Mixing up groups can also be an excellent way for participants to meet coworkers in other departments and expand their understanding of others’ work.

 

Let’s get real.  Sometimes genuine interaction is squashed by the presence of supervisors in the training room.  A direct report isn’t as likely to be forthcoming with questions or identify problems if her supervisor (or supervisor’s supervisor) is in the room.  The situation is tricky.  On the one hand, people want to know their supervisors receive training and learn techniques to develop their skills.  On the other hand, some people don’t want supervisors in their training session.  We believe trainers should explore how participants feel about having joint training sessions before the training is designed, not during training.

 

You can have it both ways.  Bring supervisors and line staff into training sessions together, but plan some breakout sessions where each group spends time with their peers.  For example, separate brainstorming sessions could occur as a breakout, with the line and supervisory staff coming together to report out and do some action planning at the end of the day.

The emotionally intelligent trainer must also be sensitive to cultural norms, since our companies today are becoming more diverse in terms of customers and employees alike.  I (Linda) learned this lesson early in my career when I lived in Japan.  As the Accounting Manager for an Air Force base, I managed a staff of nine, eight of whom were Japanese natives.  So that I could foster better communication, I pushed myself to learn Japanese.

 

At the close of my first year managing the department, our office decided to change some of our accounting procedures.  I elected to have an off-site workshop and conduct staff training myself, in Japanese.  During the workshop, I asked for questions but received none.  My staff smiled warmly at me all day long, took some notes, and told me at the end of the day how excellent the training was.  On Monday morning, however, when the staff was supposed to put the new procedures in place, it became abundantly clear that my instructions were not completely understood.  I was extremely frustrated and went home that evening to have an “over the fence” conversation with my Japanese neighbor.

 

I shared with my neighbor how I had done most of the training in Japanese and how responsive the staff seemed to be.  But, I said, “they just don’t get it.”  My neighbor bowed politely and said, “No, Linda-san, you don’t get it.  In our culture, a teacher is revered.  Students would not cause a teacher to lose face by asking too many questions.  It would show that the teacher was not a good teacher.”  What an “aha moment” for me!  I set up another training day and made two adjustments to my training style.  First, I shared with my staff at the beginning that I appreciated their cultural norm of not asking questions of the teacher.  I asked for their help in working within my American cultural norm of asking a lot of questions.  I shared with them that they would make me look good by asking many, many questions!  They nodded….they understood.  They asked questions.  Additionally, I provided mini-quizzes throughout the day so that I could review them during breaks and get a feel for how well people were understanding each segment.  I could then clarify key points that weren’t being grasped the first time.

 

Yes, this adjustment worked.  I’m eternally grateful for the valuable lesson I learned from my Japanese neighbor.

 

Using Emotions:  The Skillful Trainer

 

Another important aspect of Emotional Intelligence is the capacity to use one’s emotions, whether they are anger, joy, empathy, or frustration, in a way that is productive and positive.  For example, consider this scenario from a training event:

 

            Mary was at the end of the training day and “at the end of her

            rope” in terms of her frustration level.  One of the workshop

            participants, Joe, had just interrupted her explanation of a

            problem-solving technique.  He had been doing this all day

            long, and it really was getting to her because she was having

            a difficult time concentrating as it was.  Mary was leading a

            workshop on problem-solving for the first time and was feeling

            insecure about her level of expertise.  Joe, an engineer, was

            clearly experienced in this area and Mary felt that he was just

            showing off.  As Joe started to interrupt, Mary held up her hand

            to ward off his question and said curtly, “wait until I’m finished with 

            my explanation.”  Joe, and everyone else in the room, looked

            stunned.

 

Early on in the training day, Mary could have made the decision to include Joe in leading some discussion groups or capturing peoples’ comments on a flip chart.  This might have alleviated his need to insert himself at inappropriate times and could have provided Mary not only with extra time to think about the concept being put on the flip chart, but also with an ally instead of a foe.  Instead, Mary was so caught up in her insecurity about leading this workshop that she had a hard time feeling empathy for a person who himself might have just needed a little extra attention.

 

We have some techniques that we use prior to conducting a training event that help us sustain a level of energy and calm and in turn manage our emotions regardless of how others are behaving.   Activities that help us to gain focus and concentration prior to training is to practice either yoga or T’ai Chi for 15-30 minutes.  Both are ancient arts that help one to call in energy, flex tired muscles, and reach a level of calm.  During particularly stressful training events, we may find a quiet place and take 15 minutes during breaks to do a few light exercises or practice deep breathing.  If participants want to join in, we invite them along!

           

Unfortunately, there are some unnerving behaviors that workshop participants can engage in that will dispel one’s relaxed frame of mind.   In one of my (Linda) first workshops as a trainer, I was faced with an entire class that was angry about the way the organization’s supervisors conducted performance evaluations.  As a member of the organization myself, I must say I wasn’t happy about the process either.

 

I decided that we could use our anger in a positive way and channel that energy towards developing some recommendations for changing the system.  When it became apparent that this topic was distracting and we couldn’t move on until it was addressed, I stopped the program and led a “force field analysis.”  We brainstormed recommendations for an effective performance evaluation process, and I captured participants’ ideas on a flip chart.  We discussed forces working for and against the recommended process change, along with suggestions to minimize the potential barriers.  I noted that these suggestions would be taken to my boss (a Vice President) immediately after the session.  The brief venting process helped people calm down, and the suggestions went to a person with the position power to take action.

 

For more information or comments, contact Dr. Gravett at Linda@gravett.com.

 

this window)

 
     
 

© Copyright 2007, Gravett & Associates, Cincinnati, OH