| 04-05 |
Enhancing Employee Productivity Linda Gravett, Ph.D., SPHR (Close this window) |
|
It’s time to walk away from the thinking of the last century in terms of enhancing the productivity of employees! In the 20th century, the Theory X style was all too prevalent. I sum up that approach as, “do it my way because I’m the boss.” This clearly doesn’t work with many employees, and especially Generations X and Y, our youngest employees in today’s workplace. In this article, I’d like to share some thoughts about getting employees involved and engaged by developing a workplace environment that matches what motivates employees. A couple of years ago, I worked with a bakery chain that supplied baked goods for grocery stores across the country. In one of the bakeries, the supervisory staff complained that employees responsible for maintaining yeast levels in one of the brew tanks didn’t monitor the level frequently enough, so the tank regularly went dry. When this occurred, a new “brew” had to be made and this took time and cost money. Instead of blaming the employees for just being irresponsible or lazy, I asked for their ideas and input on ways to maintain the brew at the appropriate levels. After an afternoon of brainstorming, the employees recommended that the bakery spend $100 to install a site glass at the bottom of the brew tanks. This would prevent employees from climbing a shaky and sometimes slippery ladder to look into the tank. Within one month after installation, hundreds of dollars were saved because the employees could easily monitor the brew levels by simply walking up to the tank and glancing at the site glass. When employees are included in developing solutions instead of being considered “the problem”, they’re more productive. I’ve learned that there are some motivational myths still imbedded in American industry. When supervisors try to get employees engaged and motivated using these false methods, they won’t get the results they hope for! Here are the myths: 1) More Pay = Productivity. Pay alone doesn’t encourage long-term productivity. If employees don’t respect their supervisors, can’t work well with their coworkers, or find the work environment unacceptable, no amount of pay will sustain their interest. 2) Higher goals are more motivating. Goals can certainly challenge and motivate employees – if they’re realistic. There’s a limit, however, beyond which goals can actually demotivate employees. My husband was a sales rep for a few years, and he found himself in one organization in which the Sales Director set the sales quotas for each of the sales reps. The quota for my husband’s territory was extremely high, and when he questioned the feasibility of actually achieving these goals the Sales Director said, “but you have a large territory – three big states!” The Sales Director wasn’t open to hearing that the three big states were not highly populated by companies that bought the type of equipment the company offered. After working in this unrealistic environment for a year, my husband left the company and started his own organization! 3) Job Satisfaction = Quality. An employee can be very happy with the workplace environment and coworkers. From a social standpoint, a job may meet the employee’s needs. If the employee doesn’t have the right skills and abilities to get the job done, however, there won’t be a quality result. 4) A work group must be supervised to be productive. Peer pressure from others in the group who are willing and able to provide a quality product or service is much more effective that any supervisory pressure. 5) There is one best way to motivate employees. There’s no “magic bullet” that encourages and motivates each and every employee. Some employees like constant feedback from the boss; some don’t. Some employees are primarily interested in salary and benefits; some aren’t. Employees can be motivated by one factor early in their career and other factors as they move through their career. Well, then, you may be wondering – what does motivate employees? Several researchers besides myself have interviewed employees across the country, and here are some of our findings:
There is definitely an investment to be made if organizations want to develop employees and develop a workplace that motivates and encourages productivity. I believe there’s a return on this investment that surpasses the cost. Employees who are well trained and educated about the business and their role in achieving the organization’s mission contribute to streamlining processes and systems. Who better than someone actually doing a job on a daily basis to recommend ways to improve the work process? If employees are provided with training on problem solving and process improvement techniques such as Force Field Analysis and Affinity Diagramming, the result will be more efficient and effective systems as well as improved quality. If employees are allowed and even encouraged to make decisions that affect customer satisfaction, customer retention can be positively affected. If customers are content, they tell other people. If customers aren’t content, they tell even more people! As you explore ways to keep your workforce engaged and productive, please consider this “WAM” model that my colleague Jill Shuller developed:
A M Employees must have willingness, ability and the means to do their jobs effectively. They can be willing and eager to do a good job, but they must also have the skills and abilities to do the work. They can be willing to do the job, have the appropriate skills and abilities, but not have the technology and equipment necessary. All three ingredients are important for engaged, productive employees. Feel free to contact me if you have any
questions or comments about this article.
Click here for contact
form. |