| 04-04 |
The Metrics of Recruiting Robin Throckmorton, M.A., SPHR (Close this window) |
|
With the role of human resources shifting
from service and administration to strategic planning partner, we need to
take on more accountability for how we impact the success of the business.
The biggest impact we can make is on the “human” resources the organization
employs to maintain the business. Therefore, we must assess the quality and
cost of recruiting and retaining these resources. In the 2002 SHRM/EMA Staffing Metrics Study, SHRM found that 84% of the respondents felt that a metric that measures the cost to hire a new employee was high or extremely high in importance to their job. Unfortunately, there is not a universal formula for calculating the recruitment costs associated with a hire. The cost varies from organization to organization and depends on the factors an organization chooses to include. Nevertheless, the general rule of thumb is that the cost to replace an employee is 100 – 150% of their annual salary. Depending on the number of individuals the organization needs to hire/replace, this cost could have a big impact on the bottom-line. Any impact on the bottom-line will get the attention of senior management if you can show the metrics. Since there isn’t a universal formula for calculating recruitment costs, you will need to determine what costs you want to track and attribute to your hiring. There are many direct and indirect costs that you may consider including in the calculation. Below are some of the basic costs that you need to consider: 1) Sourcing
2) Screening
3) Interviewing
Not every hire will incur all of these
expenses. And, your organization may choose not to track some of these costs
but this list is a starting point to help you identify your recruitment
costs per hire. The key is to identify what recruitment costs you are going
to track and then consistently track them for all your hires to have an
internal comparison from one hire to the next. 1) How long did it take to fill the position from start to hire date? What could you have done to reduce the time to hire and not have impacted the quality of the hire? 2) What was the impact on productivity while the position was left vacant? This is a very difficult calculation to conduct especially depending on the position. However, it does have an impact on the hiring manager and the organization as a whole. If it can’t be quantified, at least keep it in mind.
3) How satisfied was the hiring
manager / organization with the hire? This assessment can be done following
the hiring but should be repeated again 3 – 6 months after the employee has
been on the job to get a real sense of how successful the hire was. There is
an excellent tool on Staffing.org that you can use to assess the hiring
manager’s satisfaction:
http://www.staffing.org/metrics/hiring.asp.
The key to any analysis is to reflect on
what worked and what could have been done better or different the next time.
So, don’t just track the costs and set them aside. But rather, be sure you
review your cost analysis and each of these other measures to identify what
you can capitalize on next time and what you need to do different. For
example, what was the success of your recruitment sources? Which ones
provided the most candidates and more importantly the quality candidates?
Which ones did not? This type of evaluation will help you to streamline your
next hire, improve the quality, and reduce costs. |