| 03-08 |
Preventing Discrimination and Harassment in the Workplace Linda Gravett, Ph.D., SPHR, August 1, 2003 |
|
Occasionally it ‘s productive to step back
in our role as Human Resource professionals and consider how effectively
we’re preventing discrimination and harassment rather than reacting to
situations that have already occurred. This article focuses on key steps to
promote a workplace that is anchored in respect for the rights of
individuals and their jobs. When coaching line managers, I think it’s important to help them understand that there are two types of discrimination: when two different standards for hiring or promotion are used, depending on the individual; or when the same standard is used, but it’s not job related. The example I use for two different standards is the employment application process. Let’s say a Hispanic man walks into a company and indicates that he wants to apply for a job. The receptionist asks him to fill out an application form, provide six references, and then he’s sent on his way with a “we’ll call you”. On the same day, a Caucasian man walks into the company and indicates that he wants to apply for a job. He is asked to fill out the application form but not the reference list, then he’s taken directly for an interview with a hiring manager. The first man may or may not have had the skills needed for any open positions, but the company will never know. And the company is guilty of disparate treatment. The example I use for “same standard, not job related” is an interview scenario. If a hiring manager asks Hispanic, African-American, and Caucasian accounting position applicants whether they belong to a country club and play golf, the same “standard” is being used. However, being a member of a country club doesn’t relate to an applicant’s technical expertise as an accountant. Additionally, it’s more likely that the African-American and Hispanic applicants aren’t members of a country club than the Caucasian applicant. To prevent discrimination in the application and testing process, it’s important to select tests that tap into an applicant’s abilities or knowledge related to a specific position. An excellent site that provides validated tests is Pan Testing: www.pantesting.com. In order to have a solid understanding of the skills, knowledge, and abilities required for an open position, I believe it’s critical to develop a competency-based job description prior to the interview process. A competency-based job description details not only reporting relationships and key functions. It describes the core competencies (such as problem solving or decision making) required to successfully meet the expectations for the position. Please email me at Linda@gravett.com if you’d like a sample competency-based job description. Many people have asked my opinion of “personality tests” as hiring criteria. My response is that, in the first place, personality profiles like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and DISC are not validated employment tests. They’re simply indicators of peoples’ preferences in certain situations and are not absolute indicators of ability. Personality profiles have a place in teambuilding and career development, not in the hiring and selection process. I encourage you to check in with hiring managers often to make sure they have an updated list of illegal questions that cannot be asked during the interview process. Questions that should not asked, for example, are:
One form of gender discrimination is sexual
harassment. I frequently receive questions such as, “exactly what is sexual
harassment” and “what is an individual’s liability if he/she is found guilty
of sexual harassment”?
The type of sexual harassment that is most
often misunderstood is hostile environment. This occurs when there’s a
pattern of behavior so pervasive and offensive that a reasonable person or
individuals can’t focus on their work. This type of behavior can range from
unwanted touching, to calling someone sexual nicknames, to offensive posters
or calendars of partially clad men or women posted in public work spaces. To
prevent this type of atmosphere, Human Resources should provide updated
training on harassment of any type on a regular basis; publish and enforce a
harassment policy; and provide a confidential means for employees to step
forward and report harassment against themselves or others.
All of these are signs that a person may be
experiencing problems and should be investigated, not ignored.
I encourage you to audit all of your HR
procedures on a regular basis to ensure that practices, however innocent on
their surface, are not resulting in discrimination against any members of
your current or potential workforce. Feel free to contact me if you have any
questions or comments about this article.
Click here for contact
form. |